<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fed's Bolsoblog &#187; amazon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bolsi.org/bolsoblog/tag/amazon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bolsi.org/bolsoblog</link>
	<description>Anch'io col mio blog. Ecco.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 14:17:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>iPad vs. Kindle</title>
		<link>http://www.bolsi.org/bolsoblog/2010/01/29/ipad-vs-kindle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bolsi.org/bolsoblog/2010/01/29/ipad-vs-kindle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>federico</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kindle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bolsi.org/bolsoblog/?p=1020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Il primo vantaggio del Kindle &#232; di essere un gateway istantaneo verso una cospicua fetta del catalogo di Amazon. Niente spese di spedizione, clic su Shop in the Kindle Store e via.
L&#8217;interfaccia a pirullo multidirezionale &#232; roba da anni &#8216;90 che fa dimenticare il beneficio della lettura su display e-ink. La gestione della collezione di [...]<script type="text/javascript">SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: "iPad vs. Kindle", url: "http://www.bolsi.org/bolsoblog/2010/01/29/ipad-vs-kindle/" });</script>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Il primo vantaggio del Kindle &egrave; di essere un gateway istantaneo verso una cospicua fetta del catalogo di Amazon. Niente spese di spedizione, clic su <em>Shop in the Kindle Store</em> e via.</p>
<p>L&#8217;interfaccia a pirullo multidirezionale &egrave; roba da anni &#8216;90 che fa dimenticare il beneficio della lettura su display e-ink. La gestione della collezione di libri completamente assente.</p>
<p>E se Amazon si limitasse a metterci il catalogo e a raccogliere i profitti?</p>
<blockquote cite="http://daringfireball.net/2010/01/various_ipad_thoughts"><p>As for Amazon, they might wind up delighted with this thing. Apple&rsquo;s in the business of selling devices first, content second. I think Amazon is in the content business first, the device business second. A world where Kindle hardware sales pale in comparison to the iPad but where there&rsquo;s a very popular Kindle app for iPad that competes against iBooks is not a bad situation for Amazon. Apple is only selling e-books for use on their own devices; Amazon is willing to sell e-books anywhere they can.</p>
<p>(via <a href="http://daringfireball.net/2010/01/various_ipad_thoughts">Daring Fireball: Various and Assorted Thoughts and Observations Regarding the Just-Announced iPad</a>)</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://sharethis.com/item?&wp=2.8.6&amp;publisher=347a245b-f559-432d-89fc-525b4ff62e6c&amp;title=iPad+vs.+Kindle&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bolsi.org%2Fbolsoblog%2F2010%2F01%2F29%2Fipad-vs-kindle%2F">ShareThis</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bolsi.org/bolsoblog/2010/01/29/ipad-vs-kindle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
